Archive for May, 2009

Selling to BIG Co

Without a doubt selling your innnovation is CRUNCH time. Not only must the product be right, but have you the savvy and strategy to make the technical success a commercial success.

I came across a resource from those clever people at Xplane some while ago, and thought I’d share my experiences to the series of challenges as portrayed in ‘Selling to Big Co’; so…

Picture1

Welcome to BigCo, land of the complex sale, where each meeting could be your last. Each step in the sales process can move you forward or torpedo the business for good.

All along the way, the people of BigCo will have numerous conversations about your product; with each other, with their leaders and managers, with consultants – even with your competitors.

HOW CAN YOU BE SURE YOUR SOLUTION WILL BE FULLY AND COMPLETELY UNDERSTOOD, EVEN WHEN YOU CAN’T BE THERE YOURSELF?

Here are some of the challenges you will need to be prepared for….

  • Picture2Your well-meaning but bumbling champion miscommunicated your value proposition.

You invested at considerable risk to your business in an idea you all think is a winner. Will the value be so obvious to the customer you wont need to sell it?; ‘if we build it – they will come’. If the answer is no (and it will be!) then why put it into the hands of someone who is not prepared, or does not have a stake in its success? Sound outrageous? Its done every day with distributors and agents, sales people with improper incentives and/or the wrong tools.


  • Picture3Frontline managers and workers couldn’t see how your solution would help them to do their jobs better.

Consider this.. on the whole people don’t like change, especially if they don’t have to, so what would persuade them to change vendor or adopt a supposedly better solution. Whats in it for me!!

In order to address this, sell benefits..not features. How does your offering make your customers job easier, faster, better, cheaper, more productive etc etc? OK then prove it…show me the data, demonstrate it.. here…now!!


  • Picture4A competitor used technical jargon as a ’smokescreen’ to confuse buyers about your solution.

You know who your competitors are (I hope), put yourself in their shoes and think about how they would claim a superior proposition or attempt to expose your weaknesses where they have strengths. Be prepared for such a rebuttal have data, facts and evidence as per the last point.


  • Picture5A consultant who has ties to your competitor recommended against you, and nobody knew enough to disagree.

Technical businesses will work with academics or leaders in their field of chosen work. They often perform private consultancy and therefore have allegiances to companies they have worked with in the past. Who are influencers in your field? Who do they work with? Consider trade association, societies, conference organising commitees, speakers and chairs, researchers. Make sure you get the opportunity to sell the merits of your solution. Work with your own sectoral gurus and develop them into advocates.


  • Picture6The VP of NO, who must approve all purchases over £100k didn’t understand your solution.

A Power player can make the decisions about how dollars are spent. Period. Sometimes referred to as the “VP of No,” they don’t have to ask permission, and they care primarily about results.

By the time you talk to a Power Player, you’d better understand the company and the problem and you’d better have a solution to offer ideally advocated by other organisation members, but mmost importantly demonstrating a results based benefit. Power players make their decisions and move on quickly, so be prepared to move fast if this person says yes.


  • Picture7The gatekeeper didn’t understand how you were different, so you never got to meet the commercial people

And don’t underestimate Gatekeepers like Secretaries, PAs and potentially anyone else meant to be organise and control. Their job is to manage the traffic moving in and out of the organization. They are responsible for keeping the “wrong” people out and letting the “right” people in. A Gatekeeper can be a powerful ally who can put you in front of the buyer — or, if alienated, they can be a powerful foe.


  • Picture8The buyer skimmed your proposal, but didn’t understand the key differentiator you had worked so hard to establish.

By this time, you have hopefully many advocates and developed a tailored argument specific to the benefits your product will bring. However you must be able to communicate all all levels and prevent creating your own smokescreen with jargon. Dont forget the buyer is concerned with Quality, Cost and Delivery. How do you stack up, this might be a differentiator if your competition fails to deliver on-time and has unreliable product; even if they are cheaper.

Know your stuff, know your customer, know your competition and be prepared.

Add to: Twitter | Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Technorati

Comments off

Try many things, fail cheaply

Its widely proposed that to succeed and be innovative you have to had plenty of the failure experience. Therefore failure should be acceptable facet of innovation.

While acceptable, this is far from desirable, not because we dont think there is much to be learned in the process of failure and that consequential outcomes are valuable, but that by implication innovation should be a free-spirited and spontaneous process and what will be, will be.

Failure would be fine, if it wasn’t so expensive. Because failures cost money (and time), high failure rates can cause corporations to become very gun shy about innovation.

Of course, one way out of this problem is to increase the innovation success rate. A noble aspiration for sure. But be careful. Following that seemingly sensible path can lead to some perverse behavior.

A company can almost always “succeed” by introducing “new and improved” products that cannibalize what they already sell. A company can confidently state that all of its revenue comes from products launched within the past two years, feel good about its innovation efforts, and actually be falling further behind competitors.

In fact, when we look at the numbers it is estimated that only 10% of our ideas are worthy of testing, and only 10% of them will be winners. Thats 1%! . So, we are not managing a programme of success, we are actually managing a programme of failure; therefore the real answer is to dramatically decrease the cost of failure. Here are 3 ways…

  1. Lower the costs of experiments. Running experiments need not be expensive. There are tons of low cost ways to test critical assumptions. Be creative, imagine you hadn’t a budget, imagine this was your business and you dont have the cash. Beg, borrow, steal, collaborate, even postpone expensive testing until the project has been de-risked.
  2. Prioritise your unknowns. Many companies spend a lot of money answering the wrong questions. They’ll seek to perfect a technology without understanding whether there’s a market need. Assess strategic risks first, because they are often what sink an idea. Chances are someone else has already thought of your idea.
  3. Increase the pace of decision making. Entrepreneurs with clearly bad ideas typically don’t have the luxury of spending money on those ideas for too long. Companies, however, can let bad ideas linger for inordinate amounts of time because of slow decision-making processes. Shutting down flawed projects early avoids needless spending — and focuses resources on the best ideas.

Projects are often expensive because companies seek perfection in their own eyes before they run any sort of test. Remember, the less you’ve spent, the more freedom you have to change your approach.

As Seth Godin says ‘ Stop being perfect and start being remarkable’. Good enough will be good enough

And finally, remember that failure is not a dirty word. The odds are pretty high that your first idea is wrong along some meaningful dimension. If you fail fast and fail cheap, you can accelerate discovering a winning idea. 

Of course, it’s one thing for companies to say they embrace the right kind of failure. It’s quite another thing to create a culture that rewards low-risk failures and savors surprises.

In fact why shouldn’t we succeed cheaply too.

Add to: Twitter | Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Technorati

Leave a Comment